Monday, 12 March 2012

AN 'INDEPENDENT' SCOTLAND WOULD NOT BE INDEPENDENT

... 

I have kept quiet over an independent scotland for lots of reasons, mainly because it is playing "their" game by "their" rules & if you can't see that then you deserve what you voted for...

 

from Aangirfan

AN 'INDEPENDENT' SCOTLAND WOULD NOT BE INDEPENDENT




It would appear that there is a cunning plan to give Scotland a sort of 'fake' independence.

The idea is that the Scots will be given as much independence as the North American Indians, the Australian Aborigines or the good people of Diego Garcia.

In the UK parliament, Angus Robertson is the Scottish National Party leader and the spokesman on Foreign affairs and Defence.

He and his colleagues supported the 'no-fly' zone over Libya, which involved the bombing of Libya and the killing of civilians.

Herr Robertson
Robertson was born in London and his mother is German.

Robertson speaks fluent German. (Angus Robertson - Wikipedia)

He worked as a foreign and diplomatic correspondent in Central Europe for the BBC.

The BBC is believed to be run by MI6 and is believed to employ people from MI6 as foreign and diplomatic correspondents.

Robertson is a participant in the Parliamentary Armed Forces Scheme.

This gives Members of Parliament 'experience of the armed forces'.

It is sponsored by arms manufacturers.

Robertson could take over from Alex Salmond, if Salmond had an accident?
Robertson has confirmed that an 'independent' Scotland would join UN and Nato-led military operations abroad, if sanctioned by the UN.

(Independent Scotland could join Nato, say SNP sources)

Scottish National Party (SNP) sources say that the SNP is considering scrapping opposition to Nato membership.

An 'independent' Scotland could thus be a tool of the Pentagon.

Alex Salmond
SNP leader Alex Salmond is suggesting that an 'independent' Scotland would:

1. Keep sterling and the Bank of England as its central bank, by forming a currency union with the rest of the UK. 
2. Keep the monarchy. 
3. Keep the BBC as a Scottish broadcaster.

Military analysts believe an independent Scotland may have to retain Trident nuclear weapons as a price for defence co-operation with the UK.

(Independent Scotland could join Nato, say SNP sources)
So, an 'independent' Scotland would not really be independent.

Rupert Murdoch is supporting Salmond.
This explains why the SNP government in Edinburgh has:

1. Defended the guilty verdict in the 'rigged' Lockerbie trial 
2. Appeared to be part of the cover-up in the Hollie Greig child-abuse case 
3. Appeared to support the establishment of al Qaeda in Libya. 
4. Appeared to turn a blind eye to CIA rendition flights. 
5. Obtained the warm support of Rupert Murdoch!

if you follow Aangirfan you will find lots of interesting articles on any & all of the points raised in this post

I'm not trying to say that independence would be a good or bad thing, what I am suggesting is that independence is not meant to benefit you, the individual, you are not the reason for independence, it has nothing to do with you, you are insignificant in it all

consider this:
the projected revenue from scotland's oil resources is estimated to be £56 billion, if we have independence just how much do you think you will see of that?
I'll tell you... FUCK ALL
if you were to give every household in scotland £1 million from this projected revenue imagine the state of the economy with just over 5 million people spending that much money back into it?

independence is not meant to benefit you
.:.

3 comments:

Anon said...

Many thanks for the link.

I think the Norway attacks (blamed on rainwashed Breivik) were an inside job and that Norway is not really independent.

Switzerland seems to be allowed to be peaceful, democratic and happy, but, maybe that is because a lot of the bad guys have holiday homes there.

- Aangirfan

dognamedblue said...

a probably quite a few bank accounts too ;)

dognamedblue said...

oh, any news on the 2 israelis arrested on a BA flight from the US?